Letter to Thay on Diversity


By Anthuan Vuong

Wake Up Ambassadors

Leading up to my Order of Interbeing ordination at the 2015 Wake Up Ambassador Retreat during the North American Tour at Deer Park Monastery and past personal experiences in both general and Wake Up sanghas, I felt empowered to write a letter to Thich Nhat Hanh and the Plum Village delegation on issues of diversity in the United States. During my retreat this past Fall, there were three highlights that reverberated in my mind after I left.

  1. Wake Up Ambassadors have pointed out and thanked me for being its sole Wake Up representative to ordain into the Order of Interbeing during this retreat. I’m not quite sure if this is an honor or a burden of weight on my shoulders.
  2. One Asian female retreatant came up to me and stated, “Thank you for representing us up there during the O.I. ordination. I thought that this retreat was the “whitest” I have ever been to.” She was alluding to the fact that I was the only male person of color being ordained to “represent” people of color during this retreat and that most general retreatants were no Wake Uppers and white.
  3. While there was a sense of diversity among my fellow Wake Uppers and Ambassadors since some of whom flew in from the Netherlands, Germany, Canada, etc…However, a Caucasian female Wake Upper who’s lived in El Salvador for the past 5 years prior to her first retreat in Thich Nhat Hanh’s Plum Village tradition, raised a question of her awareness with me that when it comes to the majority of retreatants, this retreat only had mostly “white people.”

My three experiences above continue to reinforce further a higher need within our greater sangha(s) throughout the U.S. for more diversity in representation and inclusion. Here is my letter below in its entirety:

Dear Respected Thay Thich Nhat Hanh, Teachers, Brothers, Sisters, and the Worldwide Plum Village Community,

As a Vietnamese-American who started on my journey in Thay Thich Nhat Hanh’s Plum Village tradition over fifteen years ago, I have seen many changes and transformations within our tradition. One in particular is the unprecedented and innovative spark of WAKE UP—a movement that have ignited and united young adults all over the globe. What an exciting and monumental accomplishment!! This is a Happy Moment!

However, as more people are exposed to Thay’s teachings and Sangha(s) formed, what I also see consistently is that these communities specifically in the United States are comprised of mostly whites or European-Americans. These are my experiences attending Organic Garden Sangha in Los Angeles, Open Heart Sangha in San Diego, Mindfulness Community of Puget Sound in Seattle, Mindfulness Community of Atlanta, Salem–Oregon, New Orleans–Louisiana, and some Wake Up events here in Southern California. Cities such as Los Angeles, San Diego, and Atlanta are some of the most diverse in the world if we allow ourselves to drive around town or work in some major corporations. We could easily hear a language other than English spoken from one community to another.

Yet, internally within our monasteries and lay communities, such diverse representations among Sangha members are limited or lack thereof. Guests to monasteries such as Deer Park and Blue Cliff’s attending Days of Mindfulness are also predominantly white. One organizer explicitly brought up this issue of lacking diversity during my most recent Wake Up camping trip with Wake Uppers all over California. We both agreed that our demographic represented consisted of half European-Americans and People of Color stemming from various ethnic backgrounds. Yet, the three main outspoken organizers were white males.  Perhaps, it may be time for us to point out the pink elephant in the room and talk about this often time volatile and difficult topic.

Perhaps, it may be time for us to point out the pink elephant in the room and talk about this often time volatile and difficult topic.

Here are a few more observations at various Wake Up events I have seen last year in 2015:

  1. (Aug. 01, 2015) “The Way Out is In” Day of Mindfulness at MacArthur Park in Los Angeles. Despite the fact that the park is surrounded by mostly people from Latino descents, our main monastic organizer was European-American. Our three main lay presenters and organizers were also European-Americans. One of whom is a biracial female. I am not sure that having primarily white organizers in a community that is predominantly Latino surely addressed our targeted audience’s needs and aspirations.
  2. (Sept. 4-7, 2015) Wake Up Camp Out at Sequoia National Park. While organizers have been planning for this event many months in advance with a few person of colors, our three main outspoken facilitators throughout this event were three white males. I had a discussion with one of these facilitators and he’d agreed that this is a problem that needed to be addressed.
  3. (Sept.-Oct. 2015) Wake Up House San Diego. While the numbers may fluctuate as they enter our door, but I often recognized that I am the few persons of color in the house and the ONLY one living there.
  4. (Oct. 2015) Two female Wake Uppers have walked away from Wake Up Sanghas in the San Diego area. One of whom is Latina; the other Vietnamese American. The latter was actually a core member. They raised the same diversity issues. That they didn’t feel fit in and that leadership comprised of mostly white males; therefore these spaces were not “safe” for them. Who knows how many more out there whose voices have not been heard.
  5. (Throughout) Most threads on Basecamp so far have been made by white or European members despite the fact that the Wake Up Movement is a global one.

I just pointed out the challenge of the lack of diversity among organizers and in leadership positions despite well-represented and diverse Sangha members at some various events. The other side of the challenge is that filling spaces with people of color, women, or from the LGBTQ community as “tokens” may also be counterproductive. As a Divinity student in my Buddhist Chaplaincy program the past 3 and a half years in Los Angeles, what I also saw was that my classrooms had vast array of students from all over the world. There were women and monastics representing countries covering the entire Asian continent with Buddhism embedded in their countries for millennia.

Yet, the same homogeneous picture presented itself. That despite having such a diverse student body represented and conscious efforts from our professors to garner these students’ participation, the most outspoken students that dominated classroom discussions, projects, and club participations were white males. Here, we see the opposite effect at play—diversity in representation, but homogeneous in voices and life experiences when it comes to leadership and taking initiative. So now it becomes a fine line between diversity versus life experiences. This is a fair question. I mean if a student’s English is barely proficient and his/her formative years of life experience were formed abroad, it is understandable that his/her experience of race, class, power, and oppression differ vastly from native people of color.

After all, these experiences are only found within the United States’ borders. I don’t mean to make an American issue a global one. Perhaps, Sanghas from our European nations may be much more inclusive and diverse. We “Americans” have been dealing with issues of race, class, power, and privilege close to three hundred years on our soil. Now “Americans” are dealing with polarizing issues such as police brutality, school inequity, and mass incarceration, to name a few. These issues are racially charged with potent isolating rhetoric. Again, our issues of “diversity” and the problematic definition behind it may be only within the United States and not necessarily that of abroad.

Now the question is how do we move forward? As a second generation Vietnamese-American who has organized Viet Wake Up tours and retreats specifically for Vietnamese-Americans, I can assured you that these young adults have different needs and life experiences. Now the pivotal questions among them are no longer about sustainable living or consuming organic produces, but rather dealing with cultural gaps between themselves and their parents.

Vietnamese, Vietnamese-Americans, and people of color in the United States have different needs and values. The question of how do we want our future Sanghas to look, feel, and become will eventually come up.

Other pertinent issues common among these Viet Wake Uppers include: having dual-cultural identities, growing up as an immigrant, or choosing a career profession basing on one’s inclination versus our parents’ imposition. In short, Vietnamese, Vietnamese-Americans, and people of color in the United States have different needs and values. The question of how do we want our future Sanghas to look, feel, and become will eventually come up.

If I may, I humbly would like to offer a few solutions:

  1. Diversity & Inclusion Council. Perhaps, the Plum Village International Community could come up with a “Diversity Council.” One that acts as a committee to help address issues of the lack of diversity in leaderships internally. This council could have qualified and experienced women, members of the LGBTQ community, and POC sangha members. It is also helpful to have Order of Interbeing members from these respective groups as well. Our white and European American allies could also serve on this council as well with an understanding that they are there for awareness and to help with inclusiveness. I have brought this issue among Wake Up organizers and during the Wake Up International Ambassadors Retreat at Deer Park in late October.
  2. Leadership Training & Mentorship for women, POC, & LGBTQ Members. Another possible solution is making conscious leadership trainings for women, people of color, and LGBTQ young adults members. This also means that the Plum Village international community attempts to provide safe spaces for women, POC, and LGBTQ members to feel empowered to speak up and participate. Obviously, such participation is a stretch given that they are also dealing with the same issues in school, the workplace, and society at large. I could bet that they are raising these same systemic oppression issues at these places.
  3. Have a Person of Color Wake Up age sitting on a “Racial Diversity Committee.” Having this representative will serve as a fresh voice from a person of color and young adult perspective.
  4. Facilitation & Honest Open Discussion. Guided trainings, education, and open dialogue on issues of race, power, privilege, and systemic oppression.

I will be turn 36 years old in September and know that eventually I will phase out of Wake Up. What I would like to see for the next generation and possibly for my kids in our tradition, is that when they walk into a Sangha, they don’t necessarily ask, “Why isn’t anyone here look like me?” or “Do Sangha members also have life experiences similar to mine?” Instead, what I would like to see is, “This is who I am, let’s walk on this path TOGETHER.” Another aspect is just merely showing up. This explains why I consistently come back to these Sanghas despite their representations of mostly homogeneous white and European members.

What I would like to see is, “This is who I am, let’s walk on this path TOGETHER.”

At the end of the day at its core, it really comes down to using love and understanding as its compass. If we operate from this juncture, who knows, anything can happen. Perhaps another monumental Inclusivity Wake Up?

Previous articleWhy I Became a Monastic
Next articleLove Between Us – Thich Nhat Hanh’s Sharing


  1. A thoughtful, well-presented, grounded letter from which I understand is that experiences of people of diversity are not understood and the means of inclusion is not effective in drawing more people of diversity into Sangha. More, that pressing Sangha/ life issues are different for those of minorities such as the gap between this generation and their parents. What saddens me is that the writer has created a dichotomy between environmental issues and familial issues. If the planet is collapsing due to human greed & unsustainable living, familial issues will be a moot point. More, our connection with nature has everything to do with bringing us to the sacredness, the lack of duality of all life. The fact that youth do not see this as of foremost importance is exactly why Sangha must bring it forth. All of life depends upon it. I believe giving up this overarching agenda of addressing our place within the web of life is done at our very peril.

    I cannot speak to American Mindfulness Sangha, workshops, trainings etc. because I have only been to one but, I have attended many over decade + in Canada. There, too, I did not see many folk of colour though there were plenty of GBLTQ presented. I suspect the challenges of inclusion described here reflect a universal issue confronting any caring organization of how to cross cultural divides including the importance of addressing systemic oppression.

    Thich Nhat Hanh coined the phrase “interbeing”: Mindfulness practice absolutely addresses all forms of aversion, bias & racism using the one approach. This is the beauty of the 8 fold path. Mindfulness practice thus provides concrete actions to overcome aversion, hostility, ill-will, greed, anger etc. The one approach fits all, if I might reduce it down to that simplistic phrase. In my Sangha, when practice issues arose, the content was not vital to effect change. What was important was the focus on Mindful actions facilitating acceptance, methods of examination of personal thoughts, feelings and body sensations to develop wisdom & freedom from suffering. In many respects Mindfulness is a solitary pursuit. It is all about methodology, not content. It doesn’t matter if you struggle with parents, culture, racism, hatred, fear or anger: it is all one.

    Generally speaking, Sangha can provide a vital role in addressing bias, racism, ill-will etc by addressing what is arising in the group’s moment. Thus, if people perceive themselves as outsiders, if folks are experiencing racism, the teacher-lead group would be a perfect place to address that situation with compassion and wisdom. A good teacher is also one who allows 1:1 discussions with members to discuss their concerns within the context of Mindfulness. What I am saying is that the dualism presenting is part of the journey for the recipient and the perpetrator. Of course, recipients must be supported but, equally, perpetrators are on a journey, otherwise they would motivated to keep attending Sangha.

    Rather than having Sangha responsible for direct teachings of race, power, privilege & oppression, I wonder if those are not better taught by people with great expertise in at type of training. Often women’s shelters run such trainings within their communities. I do see a role for teachers to refer to such groups when it is clear that what presents in the moment cannot be dealt with effectively within the Sangha setting. I would say the same for leadership trainings, again available through other community groups. In my mind, Mindfulness is about allowing personal wisdom to emerge rather than prescribing specific outwards actions such as becoming a leader. Leadership will emerge as required by one who has done the work of practice.

    By all means let us address the issue of lack of diversity. Why is it there are not more diverse folks within the ranks? Perhaps, they do not know of of Mindfulness as an option or it does not speak to them as an option and we need to ask ourselves why. Perhaps, there are barriers which have not been identified. I would hope the idea of a Diversity Council be taken up but, I also believe the responsibility also lies with diverse folk within Sangha, for they also could do much by communicating to their own “tribe” to inform them of what they find to be helpful. Who better?

    The thing is, we are all one, not just with each other but, with all of nature, the universe, everything. There is no duality.

    Let each of us not waste time in ending suffering and bringing joy. If my words have not been skillful, I apologize for my clumsy attempt to speak of vital challenges of living with diverse peoples and within nature. Of course, I only speak for myself, my experiences and my viewpoints as one who’s life rests in Mindfulness and who focuses on living in harmony with nature.

    Thank you for the thoughtful letter for it has certainly evoked thoughtful reflection in me and I am sure, many others.

  2. Thanks Anthuan for your letter on the lack of diversity in Wake Up’s leadership. It really resonated with me and as the only male, person of color, non-American, under-40 person on staff at Parallax and a sort of leader in our tradition, I’ve often felt alone.

  3. I am happy to say that today the mindfulness community of Greater New Orleans is quite diverse. Our members include Latina members, members of color, female members of many ethnicities and LGBT members.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here